With varying head design comes and varying amount of
control power. Teetering head designs have less control power and a more appreciable lag between cyclic movement and disc response. It should be remembered that control in the hover is achieved by a constant set of corrections being applied to the controls to prevent the helicopter from moving. When the pilot notices say a drift to the left, he will apply a right cyclic input, which in turn will tilt the disc to the right, which in turn will translate the helicopter to the right. The airframe attitude lags the input by a longer time on a teetring rotor design because there is on way of directly transmitting the control input to the airframe. The airframe attitude in this instance being a function of C of G, Wind Strength, Cyclic Stick Position.
With this in mind it is not surprising that trainee pilots over control initially by applying to great an input to the cyclic, because of the lag caused by the factors described above. The pilot applies his input, thinks nothing has happened and applies a further cyclic input, just as his first effort has an effect.